Testing for Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency AHS - M2068
Description of Procedure or Service
Alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a genetic disease that causes deficient or defective production of the alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) protease inhibitor that can affect the lungs, liver, and skin (Stoller, 2022b). AAT deficiency results in unbalanced rapid breakdown of proteins, especially in the supporting elastic tissue of the lungs (NORD, 2022).
***Note: This Medical Policy is complex and technical. For questions concerning the technical language and/or specific clinical indications for its use, please consult your physician.
Policy
BCBSNC will provide coverage for testing for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency when it is determined to be medically necessary because the medical criteria and guidelines shown below are met.
Benefits Application
This medical policy relates only to the services or supplies described herein. Please refer to the Member's Benefit Booklet for availability of benefits. Member's benefits may vary according to benefit design; therefore member benefit language should be reviewed before applying the terms of this medical policy.
When Testing for Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency is covered
- For individuals who are suspected of having alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency, serum quantification of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) protein and AAT phenotyping or AAT proteotyping or genetic testing for AAT deficiency (see Note 1) is considered medically necessary in any of the following situations:
- For symptomatic individuals 18 years or older with emphysema, COPD, or asthma.
- For individuals with unexplained liver disease.
- For individuals with persistent obstruction on pulmonary function tests without identifiable risk factors (e.g., cigarette smoking, occupational exposure).
- For individuals 18 years or older with necrotizing panniculitis.
- For the siblings of an individual with known alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency.
- For individuals with anti-proteinase three-positive vasculitis (C-ANCA [anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody]-positive vasculitis).
- For individuals with bronchiectasis without evident etiology.
- For individuals who have negative genotype results for common variants or who have discordant results between AAT serum levels and proteotype, but for whom a clinical suspicion of AAT deficiency remains, isoelectric focusing/phenotyping is considered medically necessary.
- For individuals with a first-degree relative (see Note 2) with AAT deficiency, comprehensive SERPINA1 gene sequencing is considered medically necessary.
- For individuals with negative genotype testing for common variants or discordant results between AAT serum levels and proteotype or phenotype, but for whom the clinical suspicion of AAT deficiency remains, comprehensive SERPINA1 gene sequencing is considered medically necessary.
Notes:
Note 1:AAT phenotyping should be performed using isoelectric focusing. AAT proteotyping (Pi-typing or protease inhibitor typing) for Z and S alleles should be performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Initial genetic testing should be restricted to genotyping of SERPINA1 S and Z allele mutations.
Note 2: First-degree relatives include parents, full siblings, and children of the individual.
When Testing for Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency is not covered
For all other situations not described above, testing for AAT deficiency is considered investigational.
Policy Guidelines
Background
Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is an underrecognized genetic condition that affects approximately 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 5,000 individuals and predisposes to liver disease and early-onset emphysema (Stoller & Aboussouan, 2012). It is estimated (Campos et al., 2005) that up to 80,000 to 100,000 people in the United States have the severe form of the disease (homozygous in null or abnormal alleles). There is much variation in the disease prevalence in other nations (de Serres et al., 2007), but most current estimates are that 3 million people worldwide have severe AATD (Stoller, 2022a).
AATD is a result of abnormal alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) protein inherited in an autosomal recessive pattern with codominant expression in which both genes inherited can be active and contribute to the genetic trait they control. AAT is a member of the serine protease inhibitor (Pi) family, referred to as “serpins”, and it inhibits the proteolytic enzymes elastase, trypsin, chymotrypsin, and thrombin. AAT is encoded by the gene SERPINA1 (Stoller, 2022a).
The AAT protein is produced in the liver and has a role in protecting lungs from injury by neutrophil elastase, which is secreted by white blood cells as a response to inflammation or infection. If the enzyme remains unchecked by AAT protein, damage to alveoli resulting in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can occur. This includes emphysema, asthma, bronchiectasis, and spontaneous pneumothorax. Smoking and other environmental exposure can cause further damage (Stoller, 2022a, 2022b).
Abnormal molecules of AAT protein caused by this illness can also cause liver dysfunction. Pathologic polymerization of the variant AAT can occur, resulting in intrahepatocyte accumulation of AAT molecules, leading to cirrhosis, fibrosis, cholestasis, or hepatomegaly. Liver disease is more common in individuals with certain allele combinations. Male gender and obesity may be risk factors for progression to advanced liver disease in adulthood among patients with severe AAT deficiency. In contrast, alcohol use and viral hepatitis do not appear to increase the risk of progressive hepatic failure (Stoller, 2022b). AATD is a common genetic cause of liver disease in children (de Serres et al., 2003).
Skin manifestations of AATD are also recognized. The most associated skin condition is necrotizing panniculitis. In this condition, inflammatory skin lesions are thought to be a consequence of the AAT protein loss of function and subsequent unchecked proteolysis enzyme activity in the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Associations between alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) and vascular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, glomerulonephritis, and vasculitis have been proposed but not definitively established (Stoller, 2022b).
Due to the numerous alleles associated with AAT, each allele has been given a letter code based on the “electrophoretic mobility of the protein produced”. The normal allele is the “M” allele, and the most common mutation is the “Z” allele. This system applies for each individual allele; for example, a homozygous Z genotype would be denoted as “ZZ”. Similarly, a wildtype (or “normal”) genotype would be “MM”. Besides the normal phenotype, the three other categories of AAT include “deficient” in which insufficient AAT is produced; “null” in which no AAT is produced at all; and “dysfunctional” in which a typical amount of AAT is produced, but the AAT protein does not function correctly (Stoller, 2022a).
Proprietary Testing
Initial testing often begins with serum quantification of AAT protein. This can be done through several methods, including immune turbidimetry and nephelometry (Stoller, 2022a). A low level is generally represented by a serum level below 11 micromol/L (less than 57 mg/dl using nephelometry). Due to the variation of reference ranges in different testing methodologies, most labs will complete isoelectric phenotyping on any individual with a serum AAT levels of < 100 mg/dL (18.4 micromol/L). In fact, the American Thoracic Society suggests persons with borderline serum levels (defined as 12-35 micromoles or 90 to 140 mg/dL) have qualitative testing (ATS/ERS, 2003).
Isoelectric immunophenotype testing uses the difference in migration rates of allele variants under isoelectric focusing. For example, the M variant will migrate to the middle of the gel, Z will migrate the slowest, and F migrates quickly to the side closest to the anode. This is not a genetic test. On occasion the results can be inconclusive or discordant with quantitative testing, requiring genotype testing of the most-common variants (Stoller, 2022a).
Genotype testing for the most common allele variants can be utilized where isoelectric immunophenotype testing is inconclusive. Usually polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) techniques are utilized to determine if the most common alleles are present. When dealing with the possibility of a rare variant or null allele, full gene sequencing can be utilized as a final diagnostic measure (Stoller, 2022a).
In 2017, Grifols won FDA approval for AAT Deficiency Test, which is capable of simultaneously analyzing 99% of the most prevalent known mutations causing alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. The molecular test analyzes simultaneously 192 samples per kit, and in a single reaction, identifies 14 of the most prevalent known mutations in the SERPINA1 gene, responsible for this genetic disorder.
Using Progenika’s FDA-cleared A1AT Genotyping Test, Matrix Clinical Labs released the proprietary Alpha ID screening test, a comprehensive targeted genetic test assessing 14 common and rare alleles in the SERPINA1 gene. “The Alpha ID screening test utilizes an easy-to-use saliva collection swab and does not require a blood draw or finger stick. If a positive result is found using this test, a follow-up test, Alpha ID Confirm, uses a finger stick and a blood spot card to asses A1AT protein levels as well a potential reflex to next-generation sequencing (NGS) to help physicians achieve an accurate diagnosis of Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (A1ATD)” (Matrix Clinical Labs & 2022).
Clinical Utility and Validity
The literature on the analytic and clinical validity of genetic testing for AATD is limited. In addition, few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the impact of AATD testing on patient outcomes. Current evidence-based guidelines (Vogelmeier et al., 2017) for diagnosis and management of AATD recommend specific interventions for patients with emphysema and AATD. AAT augmentation therapy is often prescribed for patients with AATD and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD). In addition, several studies have documented that the disease is under-recognized with delay in diagnosis of between 5 to 8 years (Barrecheguren et al., 2016; Stoller et al., 2005).
Snyder et al. (2006) evaluated the laboratory methods of assessing AATD. Samples from 512 individuals were analyzed, and “A1AT concentrations were measured by nephelometry. Phenotype analysis was performed by isoelectric focusing electrophoresis. The genotype assay detected the S and Z deficiency alleles by a melting curve analysis.” Of these 512 samples, 10 (2%) were discordant between genotype and phenotype. Of these 10 results, 7 were attributed to phenotyping errors. 4% of the samples submitted to genotype and quantitative analysis were “reflexed” to phenotyping, where phenotyping confirmed the genotype result 85% of the time. The investigators concluded, “The combination of genotyping and quantification, with a reflex to phenotyping, is the optimal strategy for the laboratory evaluation of A1AT deficiency” (Snyder et al., 2006).
Sorroche et al. (2015) examined a cohort of COPD patients and the prevalence of severe AATD. 1002 patients were evaluated, and 785 (78.34%) had normal AAT levels. The remaining 217 patients had low AAT levels, but only 15 patients had a genotype associated with severe AATD. Of these 15 patients, 12 were ZZ and 3 were SZ. Of the 202 other patients, 29 were a Z heterozygote, 25 were an S heterozygote, and 4 were an SS homozygote. 144 patients could not be definitively diagnosed (Sorroche et al., 2015).
Corda et al. (2011) examined the prevalence of AATD in a supposed “high-risk” area. 817 residents participated, and 67 had low AAT serum levels. 118 residents carried AATD-related alleles, 114 of which were heterozygotes “(46 Z, 52 S, 9 P(brescia), 4 M(wurzburg), 2 I, 1 P(lowell)”. The authors concluded, “the large number of mostly asymptomatic individuals with AATD identified suggests that in high-risk areas adult population screening programs employing the latest genetic methods are feasible” (Corda et al., 2011).
Soriano et al. (2018) evaluated the prevalence of AATD testing in COPD patients. The patient sample came from “550 UK Optimum Patient Care Research Database general practices”. Out of 107,024 COPD patients, only 2.2% had any record of being tested for AATD. Of those tested, 23.7% were diagnosed with AATD. The investigators also noted that between 1994 and 2013, the incidence of AATD diagnosis increased. The authors concluded “that AATD remains markedly underdiagnosed in COPD patients” (Soriano et al., 2018).
Greulich et al. (2016) evaluated the results of a large, targeted screening program for AATD. The samples were distributed by a German AAT laboratory over a period of 12 years, and 18,638 testing kits were obtained. Of this sample, 6919 carried at least one mutation, and 1835 patients were considered to have severe AATD. 194 of these patients had “rare” genotypes. The authors concluded that “among clinical characteristics, a history of COPD, emphysema, and bronchiectasis were significant predictors for Pi*ZZ, whereas a history of asthma, cough and phlegm were predictors of not carrying the genotype Pi*ZZ” (Greulich et al., 2016).
Mattman et al. (2020) compared the comprehensiveness and efficiency of pathogenic variant (PV) detection of four different protocols from 2011 to 2018 in laboratories across Canada. From 5399 index patients, 396 ZZ genotypes were identified. The protocol for serum A1AT concentration/DNA sequencing in the Ontario center (ON-CD) yielded the highest PV detection – “genotypes with at least one PV, other than S, Z, or F, were identified at 0.67/ZZ as compared to <0.2/ZZ (all others).” However, it also had the highest rates of undefined molecular variants (UMV) (0.16/ZZ vs <0.12/ZZ) or likely benign variants (LBV) compared to all others (0.08/ZZ vs <0.06/ZZ). The authors concluded the “strategies with readily detect variants across the full coding sequence of SERPINA1 detect more PV as well as more UMV and LBV” (Mattman et al., 2020).
Hamesch et al. (2019) evaluated the clinical landscape of liver symptoms in patients with AATD, specifically the Pi*ZZ genotype. 554 patients (403 exploratory cohort, 151 confirmatory cohort) were included and were compared to 234 controls without pre-existing liver disease. The authors found significantly higher levels of serum liver enzymes in the Pi*ZZ carriers compared to controls, further noting that “significant’ fibrosis was suspected in 20%-36% of Pi*ZZ carriers. Signs of advanced fibrosis were 9 to 20 times more common in carriers compared to non-carriers. Controlled attenuation parameter of ≥280 dB/m, which suggests “severe” steatosis was detected in 39% of carriers compared to 31% of controls. Finally, Pi*ZZ carriers were found to have lower serum concentrations of triglyceride, low, and very-low density lipoprotein cholesterol compared to controls, which the authors suggested to represent impaired hepatic secretion of liquid. Overall, the authors concluded that they identified evidence of liver steatosis, impaired liver secretion, liver fibrosis, and that their data could assist in hepatologic management of Pi*ZZ carriers (Hamesch et al., 2019).
Strnad et al. (2019) investigated the impact of the Pi*Z and Pi*S genotypes on subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) or alcohol misuse. Separate cohorts of 1184 with NAFLD and 2462 with chronic alcohol abuse were included. The authors found Pi*Z genotypes in 13.8% of patients with cirrhotic NAFLD but only 2.4% of patients without liver fibrosis. From there, the increased risk of NAFLD subjects to develop cirrhosis was found to be 7.3 times higher in Pi*Z carriers. The Pi*Z variant was also found in 6.2% of alcohol abusers but only 2.2% of alcohol abusers without significant liver injury. The increased risk was found to be 5.2 times higher in Pi*Z carriers. The Pi*S variant was not associated with NAFLD-related cirrhosis and only mildly with alcohol-related cirrhosis (increased risk = 1.47 times). The authors concluded that the Pi*Z variant was the strongest “single nucleotide polymorphism-based risk factor for cirrhosis in NAFLD and alcohol misuse, whereas the Pi*S variant confers only a weak risk in alcohol misusers” and remarked that this finding should be considered in future genetic counseling of affected individuals (Strnad et al., 2019).
Carreto et al. (2020) examined the utility of routine screening for AATD among patients with bronchiectasis, due to the contradiction in guidelines from the British Thoracic Society, which recommend screening for bronchiectasis among patients with AATD, but not vice versa. After screening 1600 patients with bronchiectasis from two centers in the UK from 2012-2016, they found only eight patients with AATD. They concluded that because of the low prevalence of AATD as an etiology for disease presentation among patients with bronchiectasis, routine screening for AATD would not significantly impact clinical management through augmentation therapy, smoking cessation, and genetic counselling, among other methods. Despite this, the researchers did note that higher rates of detection may be found in other geographical regions in the UK or in other countries (Carreto et al., 2020).
In 2021, Murray et al. evaluated the efficacy of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (proteotyping)-based algorithm for AATD detection (n=5474), as compared to the more traditional isoelectric focusing (IEF) phenotyping (n=16147). Here, the authors found that LC-MS/MS reduced the rate of IEF) phenotyping by 97% and the 3% of cases that were reflexed to IEF resulted in and addition 0.2% of phenotype findings. By retrospectively applying the proteotype-based algorithm to the IEF cohort, they demonstrated a 99.9% sensitivity for the detection of deficiency-associated phenotypes. The authors concluded that the “proteotype algorithm is a sensitive and cost-effective approach for the diagnosis of clinical AAT deficiency” (Murray et al., 2021).
Bellemare et al. (2021) studied the clinical utility of determining the allelic background of mutations causing alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. SERPINA1 was DNA sequenced to identify rare variants that could confer the risk of developing emphysema. Seven carriers of a rare variant, Leu353Phe_fsTer24, known to lead to undetectable serum levels of AAT, were studied using an allele-specific DNA sequencing method that they developed. Results demonstrated that Leu353Phe_fsTer24 variant was transmitted on the same allele as the M3 variant in all the patients and two of the seven patients had either a S or Z allele. The lowest AAT serum levels were observed in compound heterozygotes for the S or Z allele, suggesting higher risk of developing emphysema. This study showed that understanding the clinical significance of genetic variants found in SERPINA1 can lead to better clinical outcomes (Bellemare et al., 2021).
Ashenhurst et al. (2022) conducted a study to examine whether direct-to-consumer genetic testing increased the identification of previously undetected individuals specifically with AATD, and whether it impacted clinical care. In this cross-sectional study using a survey from the 23andMe, Inc. research platform with 195,014 participants, researchers found that the allele frequency of PI*S was 15.1%, 6.5% for PI*Z, and 0.63% with PI*ZZ. Half of those with the PI*ZZ allele combination were able to confirm their diagnosis with a physician. 27% of the participants were first made aware of their disease status through this test, and among these participants, “the diagnostic delay interval was 22.3 years.” As a result of this finding, there was a 1.7 times increased odds of reporting smoking reduction and 4.0 times increased odds of reporting reduced alcohol consumption. This demonstrates that having convenient methods of detecting pathogenic variants of the SERPINA1 gene in commercial testing could benefit patients in the long run in terms of reducing risks of complications from AATD.
Guidelines and Recommendations
American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society
The ATS/ERS released joint guidelines on the “Diagnosis and Management of Individuals with Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency.” These recommendations are as follows (ATS/ERS, 2003):
Policy Guidelines
Recommendations were classified as follows:
Type A: Genetic testing is recommended
Type B: Genetic testing should be discussed and could be accepted or declined
Type C: Genetic testing is not recommended, i.e., should not be encouraged
Type D: Recommend against genetic testing, i.e., should be discouraged
Type A recommendations for diagnostic testing in the following situations:
- Symptomatic adults with emphysema, COPD or asthma with airflow obstruction that is not completely reversible with aggressive treatment with bronchodilators.
- Individuals with unexplained liver disease
- Asymptomatic individuals with persistent obstruction on pulmonary function tests with identifiable risk factors (e.g. cigarette smoking, occupational exposure)
- Adults with necrotizing panniculitis
- Siblings of an individual with known alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency
Type B recommendations for diagnostic testing in the following situations:
- Adults with bronchiectasis without evidence etiology
- Adolescents with persistent airflow obstruction
- Asymptomatic individuals with persistent airflow obstruction and no risk factors
- Adults with C-ANCA positive (anti-proteinase 3-positive) vasculitis
- Individuals with a family history of COPD or liver disease not known to be attributed to AAT deficiency
- Distant relatives of an individual who is homozygous for AAT deficiency
- Offspring or parents of an individual with homozygous AAT deficiency
- Siblings, offspring, parents or distant relatives of an individual who is heterozygous for AAT deficiency
- Individuals at high risk of having AAT deficiency-related diseases
- Individuals who are not at risk themselves of having AAT deficiency but who are partners of individuals who are homozygous or heterozygous for AAT deficiency
Type C recommendations for diagnostic testing in the following situations
- Adults with asthma in whom airflow obstruction is completely reversible
- Predispositional testing
- Population screening of smokers with normal spirometry
Type D recommendations for diagnostic testing in the following situations:
- Predispositional fetal testing
- Population screening of either neonates, adolescents or adults*
*Population screening is not recommended currently. However, a possible exception (type B recommendation) may apply in countries satisfying all three of the following conditions: (1) the prevalence of AAT deficiency is high (about 1/1,500, or more); (2) smoking is prevalent; and (3) adequate counseling services are available.
The following features should prompt suspicion by physicians that their patient may be more likely to have AAT deficiency:
Clinical Factors
- Early-onset emphysema (age of 45 years or less)
- Emphysema in the absence of a recognized risk factor (smoking, occupational dust exposure, etc.)
- Emphysema with prominent basilar hyperlucency
- Otherwise unexplained liver disease
- Necrotizing panniculitis
- Anti-proteinase three-positive vasculitis (C-ANCA [anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody]-positive vasculitis)
- Bronchiectasis without evident etiology
The ATS/ERS also made statements on serum testing for AATD. “Serum phenotyping by isoelectric focusing performed by a reliable laboratory is the accepted “gold standard” for diagnosing AAT deficiency”. The guidelines recommend “that all subjects with COPD or asthma characterized by incompletely reversible airflow obstruction should be tested once for quantitative AAT determination. Also, individuals with evidence of cirrhosis of the liver with no known etiology should be tested for candidate phenotypes (e.g., PI*ZZ, PI*MZ, PI*Mmalton) and testing should be considered in individuals with the syndrome of Wegener's granulomatosis (antiproteinase-3 vasculitis)” (ATS/ERS, 2003).
American College of Gastroenterology (ACG)
The ACG recommends the following for AATD:
- “Patients with persistently elevated aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) should undergo screening for alpha-1 antitrypsin (A1AT) deficiency with alpha-1 anti-trypsin phenotype.”
- Evaluation of hepatocellular injury (defined by the guidelines as “disproportionate elevation of AST and ALT levels compared with alkaline phosphatase levels") includes testing for A1AT deficiency (Kwo, et al 2017)".
World Health Organization (WHO)
The WHO released a memorandum on AATD regarding AATD’s association with conditions such as COPD and asthma. Their recommendation is as follows: “It is therefore recommended that all patients with COPD and adults and adolescents with asthma be screened once for AAT deficiency using a quantitative test. Those with abnormal results on screening should undergo PI typing” (WHO, 1997).
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
The ERS (Miravitlles et al., 2017) published updated guidelines which recommend:
- “The quantitative determination of AAT levels in blood is a crucial first test to identify AATD. Quantitative deficiency must be supported by qualitative tests to identify the genetic mutation(s) causing AATD.”
- “Protein phenotyping by isoelectric focusing identifies variants where AAT is present in the sample including the rarer variants F, I and P etc.”
- “Genotyping allows a rapid and precise identification/exclusion of S an Z alleles and other variants, where specific primers are available.”
- “Gene sequencing remains necessary for those cases where a null variant or a deficient variant other than Z or S is suspected.”
- “Testing of relatives of identified patients should be considered after appropriate counselling.
- “Genetic testing should be carried out only after informed consent is given and in accordance with the relevant guidelines and legislation.”
The ERS has also noted that “there is no evidence to support efficacy of AAT augmentation therapy in PiSZ, PiMZ or current smokers of any protein phenotype” (Miravitlles et al., 2017).
Alpha-1 Foundation
The Alpha-1 Foundation (Sandhaus et al., 2016) sponsored a medical and scientific advisory committee of experts to examine all relevant, recent literature in order to provide concise recommendations for the diagnosis and management of individuals with AATD.
- “For family testing after a proband is identified, AAT level testing alone is not recommended because it does not fully characterize disease risk from AATD.”
- “For diagnostic testing of symptomatic individuals, they recommend genotyping for at least the S and Z alleles. Advanced or confirmatory testing should include Pi-typing, AAT level testing, and/or expanded genotyping.”
- “All patients with COPD, unexplained chronic liver disease, necrotizing panniculitis, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, or unexplained bronchiectasis should be tested for AATD.”
- “Parents, siblings, and children, as well as extended family of individuals identified with an abnormal gene for AAT, should be provided genetic counseling and offered testing for AATD (see guideline document for special considerations about testing minors).”
The Foundation also noted the following (these statements were not labeled recommendations):
- “For primary diagnosis of AATD the most sensitive and specific method of diagnosis is direct identification of the Z allele by genotyping. By also including the S allele, genotyping for the S and Z allele is greater than 99% specific and sensitive. “
- “AAT levels are insufficient to identify at risk individuals because the AAT level changes with inflammation, pregnancy, and in children. “
- “The range of serum AAT levels among individuals with specific genotypes is sufficiently broad that there is overlap between different genotypes. Thus, serum AAT levels cannot discriminate between different genotypes and additional AAT testing is needed” (Sandhaus et al., 2016).
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)
GOLD notes that “The most relevant genetic risk factor for COPD identified are mutations in SERPINA1, leading to α-1 antitrypsin deficiency, a major circulating inhibitor of serine proteases. The PiZZ genotype affects 0.12% of COPD patients, and its prevalence ranges from 1 in 408 in Northern Europe to 1 in 1,274 in Eastern Europe. There is no increased COPD risk in heterozygotes (MZ and SZ) in the absence of smoking. Other genetic variants have also been associated with reduced lung function and risk of COPD; their individual effect size is small, although their co-occurrence may increase disease susceptibility” (Agusti et al., 2023).
Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS)
The CTS released guidelines on genetic testing for AATD, which are as follows:
- “We suggest targeted testing for A1AT deficiency be considered in individuals with COPD diagnosed before 65 years of age or with a smoking history of <20 pack years. (Grade of recommendation: 2C)”
- “We suggest targeted testing for A1AT deficiency not be undertaken in individuals with bronchiectasis or asthma. (Grade of recommendation: 2C)” (Marciniuk et al., 2012)
National Institute Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
NICE published a guideline discussing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 2019. In it, they note that measurement of serum alpha-1 antitrypsin has a role in identifying deficiencies if the condition is “early onset, [of] minimal smoking history, or [has] family history” (NICE, 2019).
State and Federal Regulations, as applicable
Food and Drug Administration
On November 17, 2017, the FDA approved Grifols’ (Grifols, 2017) SERPINA1 Variant Detection System as a qualitative in vitro molecular diagnostic system used to detect variants in SERPINA1 gene in genomic DNA isolated from human specimens. On November 7, 2019, the FDA approved Grifols’ AlphaID™, a cheek swab that can screen patients with COPD for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. It “utilizes an FDA-approved genotyping assay to screen for the 14 most prevalently reported genetic mutations associated with Alpha-1, including the S, Z, F, I alleles, as well as rare and null alleles, helping detect patients who are at risk for this treatable condition” (Grifols, 2019).
On April 6, 2017 the FDA approved (FDA, 2017) the 23andMe PGS Genetic Health Risk Report for Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency (AATD) which determines if a person has variants associated with a higher risk of developing AATD-associated lung or liver disease. This report is based on a qualitative genetic test for single nucleotide polymorphism detection of the PI*Z (rs28929474) and PI*S (rs17580) variants in the SERPINA1 gene by using the 23andMe Personal Genome Service.
Many labs have developed specific tests that they must validate and perform in house. These laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) are regulated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) as high-complexity tests under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA ’88). LDTs are not approved or cleared by the U. S. Food and Drug Administration; however, FDA clearance or approval is not currently required for clinical use.
Billing/Coding/Physician Documentation Information
This policy may apply to the following codes. Inclusion of a code in this section does not guarantee that it will be reimbursed. For further information on reimbursement guidelines, please see Administrative Policies on the Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina web site at www.bcbsnc.com. They are listed in the Category Search on the Medical Policy search page.
Applicable service codes: 82103, 82104, 82542, 81332, 81479, 83789
BCBSNC may request medical records for determination of medical necessity. When medical records are requested, letters of support and/or explanation are often useful, but are not sufficient documentation unless all specific information needed to make a medical necessity determination is included.
Scientific Background and Reference Sources
Agusti, A., Celli, B. R., Criner, G. J., Halpin, D., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P., Bourbeau, J., Han, M. K., Martinez, F. J., Montes de Oca, M., Mortimer, K., Papi, A., Pavord, I., Roche, N., Salvi, S., Sin, D. D., Singh, D., Stockley, R., Lopez Varela, M. V., . . . Vogelmeier, C. F. (2023). Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2023 Report: GOLD Executive Summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 207(7), 819-837. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202301-0106PP
Ashenhurst, J. R., Nhan, H., Shelton, J. F., Wu, S., Tung, J. Y., Elson, S. L., & Stoller, J. K. (2022). Prevalence of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency, Self-Reported Behavior Change, and Health Care Engagement Among Direct-to-Consumer Recipients of a Personalized Genetic Risk Report. Chest, 161(2), 373-381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.09.041
ATS/ERS. (2003). American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: standards for the diagnosis and management of individuals with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 168(7), 818-900. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.168.7.818
Barrecheguren, M., Monteagudo, M., Simonet, P., Llor, C., Rodriguez, E., Ferrer, J., Esquinas, C., & Miravitlles, M. (2016). Diagnosis of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: a population-based study. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, 11, 999-1004. https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s108505
Bellemare, J., Gaudreault, N., Valette, K., Belmonte, I., Nuñez, A., Miravitlles, M., Maltais, F., & Bossé, Y. (2021). The Clinical Utility of Determining the Allelic Background of Mutations Causing Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency: The Case with the Null Variant Q0(Mattawa)/Q0(Ourém). Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis, 8(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.8.1.2020.0168
Campos, M. A., Wanner, A., Zhang, G., & Sandhaus, R. A. (2005). Trends in the diagnosis of symptomatic patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency between 1968 and 2003. Chest, 128(3), 1179-1186. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.3.1179
Carreto, L., Morrison, M., Donovan, J., Finch, S., Tan, G. L., Fardon, T., Wilson, R., Furrie, E., Loebinger, M., & Chalmers, J. D. (2020). Utility of routine screening for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency in patients with bronchiectasis. Thorax, 75(7), 592-593. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214195
Corda, L., Medicina, D., La Piana, G. E., Bertella, E., Moretti, G., Bianchi, L., Pinelli, V., Savoldi, G., Baiardi, P., Facchetti, F., Gatta, N., Annesi-Maesano, I., & Balbi, B. (2011). Population genetic screening for alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency in a high-prevalence area. Respiration, 82(5), 418-425. https://doi.org/10.1159/000325067
de Serres, F. J., Blanco, I., & Fernandez-Bustillo, E. (2003). Genetic epidemiology of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency in North America and Australia/New Zealand: Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States of America. Clin Genet, 64(5), 382-397.
de Serres, F. J., Blanco, I., & Fernandez-Bustillo, E. (2007). PI S and PI Z alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency worldwide. A review of existing genetic epidemiological data. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis, 67(4), 184-208. https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2007.476
FDA. (2017). Decision Summary for 23andMe PGS Genetic Health Risk Report. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Retrieved from https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/reviews/DEN160026.pdf
Greulich, T., Nell, C., Herr, C., Vogelmeier, C., Kotke, V., Wiedmann, S., Wencker, M., Bals, R., & Koczulla, A. R. (2016). Results from a large targeted screening program for alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency: 2003 - 2015. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 11(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0453-8
Grifols. (2017). FDA approval of genetic test for alpha-1 deficiency and EMA approval of fibrin sealant. http://www.grifols.com/en/web/international/view-news/-/new/fda-approval-of-genetic-test-for-alpha-1- deficiency-and-ema-approval-of-fibrin-sealant
Grifols. (2019, November 7). Grifols introduces AlphaID™, a free cheek swab to screen for Alpha-1, the most common genetic form of COPD. Retrieved April 11 from https://www.grifols.com/en/view-news/- /news/grifols-introduces-alphaid-a-free-cheek-swab-to-screen-for-alpha-1-the-most-common-genetic-form-of-copd
Hamesch, K., Mandorfer, M., Pereira, V. M., Moeller, L. S., Pons, M., Dolman, G. E., Reichert, M. C., Schneider, C. V., Woditsch, V., Voss, J., Lindhauer, C., Fromme, M., Spivak, I., Guldiken, N., Zhou, B., Arslanow, A., Schaefer, B., Zoller, H., Aigner, E., . . . Strnad, P. (2019). Liver Fibrosis and Metabolic Alterations in Adults With alpha-1-antitrypsin Deficiency Caused by the Pi*ZZ Mutation. Gastroenterology, 157(3), 705-719.e718. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.05.013
Kwo, P. Y., Cohen, S. M., & Lim, J. K. (2017). ACG Clinical Guideline: Evaluation of Abnormal Liver Chemistries. Am J Gastroenterol, 112(1), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.517
Marciniuk, D. D., Hernandez, P., Balter, M., Bourbeau, J., Chapman, K. R., Ford, G. T., Lauzon, J. L., Maltais, F., O'Donnell, D. E., Goodridge, D., Strange, C., Cave, A. J., Curren, K., & Muthuri, S. (2012). Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency targeted testing and augmentation therapy: a Canadian Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline. Can Respir J, 19(2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/920918
Matrix Clinical Labs, & (2022). AlphaID. http://www.biocerna.com/alphaid
Mattman, A., Gilfix, B. M., Chen, S. X., DeMarco, M. L., Kyle, B. D., Parker, M. L., Agbor, T. A., Jung, B., Selvarajah, S., Barakauskas, V. E., Vaags, A. K., Estey, M. P., Nelson, T. N., & Speevak, M. D. (2020). Alpha-1-antitrypsin molecular testing in Canada: A seven year, multi-centre comparison. Clin Biochem, 81, 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2020.05.001
Miravitlles, M., Dirksen, A., Ferrarotti, I., Koblizek, V., Lange, P., Mahadeva, R., McElvaney, N. G., Parr, D., Piitulainen, E., Roche, N., Stolk, J., Thabut, G., Turner, A., Vogelmeier, C., & Stockley, R. A. (2017). European Respiratory Society statement: diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary disease in alpha1- antitrypsin deficiency. Eur Respir J, 50(5). https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00610-2017
Murray, J. D., Willrich, M. A., Krowka, M. J., Bobr, A., Murray, D. L., Halling, K. C., Graham, R. P., & Snyder, M. R. (2021). Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry-Based alpha1-Antitrypsin (AAT) Testing. Am J Clin Pathol, 155(4), 547-552. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqaa149
NICE. (2019, July 26). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in over 16s: diagnosis and management. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng115/chapter/Recommendations
NORD. (2022). Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency. https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/alpha-1-antitrypsin-deficiency/
Sandhaus, R. A., Turino, G., Brantly, M. L., Campos, M., Cross, C. E., Goodman, K., Hogarth, D. K., Knight, S. L., Stocks, J. M., Stoller, J. K., Strange, C., & Teckman, J. (2016). The Diagnosis and Management of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency in the Adult. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis, 3(3), 668-682. https://doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.3.3.2015.0182
Snyder, M. R., Katzmann, J. A., Butz, M. L., Wiley, C., Yang, P., Dawson, D. B., Halling, K. C., Highsmith, W. E., & Thibodeau, S. N. (2006). Diagnosis of alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency: An algorithm of quantification, genotyping, and phenotyping. Clin Chem, 52(12), 2236-2242. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2006.072991
Soriano, J. B., Lucas, S. J., Jones, R., Miravitlles, M., Carter, V., Small, I., Price, D., & Mahadeva, R. (2018). Trends of testing for and diagnosis of alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency in the UK: more testing is needed. Eur Respir J, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00360-2018
Sorroche, P. B., Fernandez Acquier, M., Lopez Jove, O., Giugno, E., Pace, S., Livellara, B., Legal, S., Oyhamburu, J., & Saez, M. S. (2015). Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency in COPD Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Arch Bronconeumol, 51(11), 539-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2015.01.008
Stoller, J. (2022a, September 13). Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and natural history of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/clinical-manifestations-diagnosis-and-natural-history-of-alpha-1-antitrypsin-deficiency
Stoller, J. (2022b, July 6). Extrapulmonary manifestations of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/extrapulmonary-manifestations-of-alpha-1-antitrypsin-deficiency
Stoller, J. K., & Aboussouan, L. S. (2012). A review of alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 185(3), 246-259. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201108-1428CI
Stoller, J. K., Sandhaus, R. A., Turino, G., Dickson, R., Rodgers, K., & Strange, C. (2005). Delay in diagnosis of alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency: a continuing problem. Chest, 128(4), 1989-1994. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.128.4.1989
Strnad, P., Buch, S., Hamesch, K., Fischer, J., Rosendahl, J., Schmelz, R., Brueckner, S., Brosch, M., Heimes, C. V., Woditsch, V., Scholten, D., Nischalke, H. D., Janciauskiene, S., Mandorfer, M., Trauner, M., Way, M. J., McQuillin, A., Reichert, M. C., Krawczyk, M., . . . Trautwein, C. (2019). Heterozygous carriage of the alpha1-antitrypsin Pi*Z variant increases the risk to develop liver cirrhosis. Gut, 68(6), 1099-1107. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316228
Vogelmeier, C. F., Criner, G. J., Martinez, F. J., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Bourbeau, J., Celli, B. R., Chen, R., Decramer, M., Fabbri, L. M., Frith, P., Halpin, D. M., Lopez Varela, M. V., Nishimura, M., Roche, N., Rodriguez-Roisin, R., Sin, D. D., Singh, D., Stockley, R., . . . Agusti, A. (2017). Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report: GOLD Executive Summary. Respirology, 22(3), 575-601. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.13012
WHO. (1997). Alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency: memorandum from a WHO meeting. Bull World Health Organ, 75(5), 397-415. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/55120/bulletin_1997_75%285%29_397- 415.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Specialty Matched Consultant Advisory Panel review 3/2020
Medical Director review 3/2020
Specialty Matched Consultant Advisory Panel review 3/2021
Medical Director review 3/2021
Medical Director review 7/2022
Medical Director review 7/2023
Policy Implementation/Update Information
For policy titled: Genetic Testing for Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency
1/1/2019 BCBSNC will provide coverage for genetic testing for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency when it is determined to be medically necessary because the criteria and guidelines are met. Medical Director review 1/1/2019. Policy noticed 1/1/2019 for effective date 4/1/2019. (jd)
For policy titled: Testing for Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency
9/10/2019 Reviewed by Avalon 2nd Quarter 2019 CAB with title change. Made the following changes to the When Covered section: reordered and separated indications into two subclasses: serum testing and genetic testing; added indication stating when serum testing of antitrypsin levels is medically necessary; separated IEF and genetic testing indications and made a separate indication for genetic testing of high-risk individuals due to first-degree relative positive for AATD for clarity. Policy guidelines revised and updated. Added the following code to the Billing/Coding section: 81479 and removed code table. References updated. Medical Director review 8/2019. (jd)
3/31/20 Specialty Matched Consultant Advisory Panel review 3/2020. Medical Director review 3/2020. (jd)
7/28/20 Reviewed by Avalon 2nd Quarter 2020 CAB. Policy guidelines and references updated. Medical Director review 7/2020. (jd)
3/31/21 Specialty Matched Consultant Advisory Panel review 3/2021. Medical Director review 3/2021. (jd)
8/24/21 Reviewed by Avalon 2nd Quarter 2021 CAB. Description, Policy Guidelines and Reference sections updated. Medical Director review 7/2021. (jd)
9/13/22 Reviewed by Avalon 2nd Quarter 2022 CAB. Description, Background, Policy Guidelines and Reference sections updated. Items 2, 4, 5 under the When Covered section updated for clarity. No change to policy statement. Medical Director review 7/2022. (tm)
8/15/23 Reviewed by Avalon 2nd Quarter 2023 CAB. Description, Policy Guidelines and Reference sections updated. Made the following changes to the When Covered section: combined serum quantification, phenotyping, proteotyping, and genotyping into a single criteria, with the conditions from coverage criteria 1 remaining, results in deletion of previous coverage criteria 3. Added new Notes 1 and 2: “Note 1: AAT phenotyping should be performed using isoelectric focusing. AAT proteotyping (Pi-typing or protease inhibitor typing) for Z and S alleles should be performed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Initial genetic testing should be restricted to genotyping of SERPINA1 S and Z allele mutations. Note 2: First-degree relatives include parents, full siblings, and children of the individual.” Not Covered section edited for clarity. Medical Director review 7/2023. (tm)
Disclosures:
BCBSNC may request medical records for determination of medical necessity. When medical records are requested, letters of support and/or explanation are often useful but are not sufficient documentation unless all specific information needed to make a medical necessity determination is included.
Medical policy is not an authorization, certification, explanation of benefits or a contract. Benefits and eligibility are determined before medical guidelines and payment guidelines are applied. Benefits are determined by the group contract and subscriber certificate that is in effect at the time services are rendered. This document is solely provided for informational purposes only and is based on research of current medical literature and review of common medical practices in the treatment and diagnosis of disease. Medical practices and knowledge are constantly changing and BCBSNC reserves the right to review and revise its medical policies periodically.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age or disability in its health programs and activities. Learn more about our non-discrimination policy and no-cost services available to you.
Information in other languages: Español 中文 Tiếng Việt 한국어 Français العَرَبِيَّة Hmoob ру́сский Tagalog ગુજરાતી ភាសាខ្មែរ Deutsch हिन्दी ລາວ 日本語
© 2025 Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina. ®, SM Marks of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, an association of independent Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans. All other marks and names are property of their respective owners. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina is an independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association.